„SKRIVANJE IZA BOLONJE”
METONIMIJA, METAFORA I POJMOVNO ZAMAGLJIVANJE U DISKURSU BOLONJSKOG PROCESA
Кључне речи:
Bolonja, diskurs Bolonjskog procesa, metonimija, metafora, kognitivna lingvistikaСажетак
U radu se na teorijskoj podlozi kognitivne lingvistike, na materijalu iz engleskog jezika, razmatra metonimijsko i metaforičko građenje značenja u diskursu vezanom za dugogodišnji proces reformi visokog obrazovanja u Evropi koji je poznat pod nazivom Bolonjski proces. Analiza nedoslovnih značenja toponima Bolonja u predmetnom diskursu pokazuje da u konceptualizaciji i diskurzivnom oblikovanju savremenog evropskog visokog obrazovanja važnu ulogu imaju metonimijska preslikavanja u kojima se ovaj toponim vezuje za različite, često neodređene ciljne pojmove, kao i višestruka, često nedosledna metaforička preslikavanja u kojima se pojmovni kompleks bolonja (za x) strukturira pomoću različitih izvornih domena (kretanje, prostor, građevina, mašina, biljka, osoba, organizovana grupa, trgovina, hrana/kuvanje), što kao rezultat ima nejasno referencijalno značenje ali preovlađujuće negativno asocijativno značenje. U razmatranju teorijskih implikacija ističe se potreba i značaj interdisciplinarnog dijaloga između kognitivne lingvistike, (kritičke) analize diskursa i pragmatičke teorije relevancije.
Референце
Barcelona et al (eds) 2011: A. Barcelona, R. Benczes, F. J. Ruiz de Mendoza Ibáñez, Defining Metonymy in Cognitive Linguistics. Towards a Consensus View,Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Biernacka 2013: E. Biernacka, A discourse dynamics investigation of metonymy in talk. PhD Dissertation, The Open University, UK.
Cameron 2003: L. Cameron, Metaphor in Educational Discourse, London and New York: Continuum.
Cameron, Deignan 2006: L. Cameron, A. Deignan, The emergence of metaphor in discourse, Applied Linguistics, 27, 671–690.
Cameron et al 2009: L. Cameron, R. Maslen, Z. Todd. J. Maule, P. Stratton, N. Stanley, The discourse dynamics approach to metaphor and metaphor-led discourse analysis, Metaphor and Symbol, 24(2), 63–89.
Charteris-Black 2004: J. Charteris-Black, Corpus Approaches to Critical Metaphor Analysis, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Fairclough, Wodak 2008: N. Fairclough, R. Wodak, The Bologna Process and the knowledge-based economy: A critical discourse analysis approach, in: B. Jessop, N. Fairclough, R. Wodak (eds), Education and the Knowledge-Based Economy in Europe, Rotterdam/Taipei: Sense Publishers, 109–126.
Fejes 2008: A. Fejes, Standardising Europe: The Bologna Process and new modes of governing, Learning and Teaching – The International Journal of Higher Education in the Social Sciences, 1(2), 25–49.
Fusaroli, Morgagni (eds) 2013: R. Fusaroli, S. Morgagni, Conceptual Metaphor Theory: Thirty Years After, Journal of Cognitive Semiotics (special issue), V(1–2).
Gibbs 2011: R. W. Gibbs, Evaluating conceptual metaphor theory, Discourse Processes,48(8), 529–562.
Gibbs (ed) 2008: R. W. Gibbs, The Cambridge Handbook of Metaphor and Thought, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Gibbs, Cameron 2008: R. W. Gibbs, L. Cameron, The socio-cognitive dynamics of metaphor performance, Cognitive Systems Research, 9, 64–75.
Gibbs, Tendahl 2006: R. W. Gibbs, M. Tendahl, Cognitive effort and effects in metaphor comprehension: Relevance theory and psycholinguistics, Mind & Language, 21(3), 379–403.
Goatly 2002: A. Goatly, Conflicting metaphors in the Hong Kong special administrative region educational reform proposals, Metaphor and Symbol, 17(4), 263–294.
Halverson 2012: S. Halverson, Metonymic extension and vagueness: Schengen and Kyoto in Norwegian newspaper discourse, in: G. Andersen (ed), Exploring Newspaper Language: Using the Web to Create and Investigate a Large Corpus of Modern Norwegian, Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 285–306.
Keeling 2006: R. Keeling, The Bologna Process and the Lisbon Research Agenda: The European Commission’s expanding role in higher education discourse, European Journal of Education, 41(2), 203–223.
Koller 2004: V. Koller, Businesswomen and war metaphors: ‘possessive, jealous and pugnacious?’, Journal of Sociolinguistics, 8(1), 3–22.
Kövecses 2002: Z. Kövecses, Metaphor: A Practical Introduction, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Lakoff, Johnson 1999: G. Lakoff, M. Johnson, Philosophy in the Flesh: The Embodied Mind and Its Challenge to Western Thought, New York: Basic Books.
Lakoff, Johnson 1980: G. Lakoff, M. Johnson, Metaphors We Live By, Chicago: Chicago University Press.
Langacker 1993: R. W. Langacker, Reference-point constructions, Cognitive Linguistics, 4(1), 1–38.
Liesner 2006: A. Liesner, Education or service? Remarks on teaching and learning in the entrepreneurial university, Educational Philosophy and Theory, 38(4), 483–495.
Markert, Nissim 2006: K. Markert, M. Nissim, Metonymic proper names: A corpus-based account, in: A. Stefanowitsch, S. T. Gries (eds), Corpus-based Approaches to Metaphor and Metonymy, Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter, 152–174.
Musolff 2012: A. Musolff, The study of metaphor as part of critical discourse analysis, Critical Discourse Studies, 9(3), 301–310.
Musolff 2004: A. Musolff, Metaphor and Political Discourse: Analogical Reasoning in Debates about Europe, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Musolff, Zinken (eds) 2009: A. Musolff, J. Zinken, Metaphor and Discourse, Basingstoke/New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Panther, Thornburg 2004: K.-U. Panther, L. Thornburg, The role of conceptual metonymy in meaning construction, Metaphorik.de, 6, 91–116.
Panther, Radden (eds) 1999: K.-U. Panther, G. Radden, Metonymy in Language and Thought. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Rasulić 2010: K. Rasulić, Aspekti metonimije u jeziku i mišljenju, Theoria, 53(3), 49–70.
Rasulić (in preparation): K. Rasulić, Turning the heart into a neighbour: (Re)framing Kosovo in Serbian political discourse. (Paper presented at the Fifth International Conference on Critical Approaches to Discourse Analysis across Disciplines, Budapest: Eötvös Loránd University, September 2014.)
Semino 2008: E. Semino, Metaphor in Discourse, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Steen 2011: G. J. Steen, The contemporary theory of metaphor – now new and improved!, Review of Cognitive Linguistics, 9(1), 26–64.
Tendahl 2009: M. Tendahl, A Hybrid Theory of Metaphor: Relevance Theory and Cognitive Linguistics, Houndmills, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Tendahl, Gibbs 2008: M. Tendahl, R. W. Gibbs, Complementary perspectives on metaphor: Cognitive linguistics and relevance theory, Journal of Pragmatics, 40, 1823–1864.
Wilson 2011: D. Wilson, Parallels and differences in the treatment of metaphor in relevance theory and cognitive linguistics, Intercultural Pragmatics, 8(2), 177–196.
