IMPLICIT VALUES IN THE PREAMBLES OF THE CONSTITUTIONS IN SERBIAN AND ENGLISH

A CRITICAL PRAGMATIC APPROACH

Authors

  • Marko Janićijević State University in Novi Pazar, Department of Philology Sciences

Keywords:

values, constitution, preamble, implication, existential/propositional/value assumption, ideology, discourse

Abstract

Values are mostly not explicit in texts, but are assumed, i.e. implicit. From the perspective of critical pragmatics, this paper deals with implicit values revealing them by analysis of presuppositions, semantic implications, (pragmatic) implicatures, and related phenomena in the preambles of the constitutions of Yugoslavia 1963-1974, Serbia 1990-2006, the EU (signed 2004) and the United States of America. The identified values are associated to the corresponding discourses, which are based on the various sociopolitical ideologies. The preambles, as shown, have the pragmatic function of legitimation of the constitutions, wherein they rely on numerous existential, propositional and value assumptions (terms from Fairclough 2003) and related implications relevant for reproduction and inculcation of values. Through nominalisations and adjectivisations, the propositional assumptions (of actions, processes) are represented as existential assumptions (of entities, qualities), which we, analogously to grammatical metaphor (Halliday 1985), labelled “pragmatic metaphor”.

References

Богранде 1997: R. de. Beaugrande, New Foundations for a Science of Text and Discourse. http://www.beaugrande.com/new_foundations_for_a_science.htm. 08.04.2012.

Ферклаф 2003: N. Fairclough, Analysing Discourse: Textual Analysis for Social Research, New York: Routledge.

Халидеј 1985: M. A. K. Halliday, An Introduction to Functional Grammar, London: Arnold.

Хејвуд 2003: A. Heywood, Political Ideologies: An Introduction. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

Левинсон 1983: S. C. Levinson, Pragmatics, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Левинсон 2000: S. Levinson, Presumptive Meanings: The Theory of Generalized Conversational Implicature, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Лич 1983: G. Leech, Principles of Pragmatics, London: Longman.

Прћић 2010: T. Prćić, Mali englesko-srpski rečnik pragmatičkih termina, u: V. Vasić (red.), Diskurs i diskursi, zbornik u čast Svenki Savić, Novi Sad: Filozofski fakultet, 399-415.

Тарнер 2006: B. S. Turner, The Cambridge Dictionary of Sociology, New York: Cambridge University Press.

Ван Дејк 2001: T. A. van Dijk, Discourse, ideology and context, Folia Linguistica, XXX, 1-2, 11-40.

Ницовић 2007: Ј. Ницовић, Уставни развој Србије: 1804-2006, Београд: Sezam medico.

Устав ЕУ: Treaty establishing a Constitution for Europe, Official Journal of the European Union, C series, No 310 (16 December 2004).

Устав РС90: Устав Републике Србије, Службени гласник Републике Србије, 1.

Устав РС06: Устав Републике Србије, Службени гласник Републике Србије, 98.

Устав САД: The Constitution of the United States, in: J. W. Peltason (ed.), About America: The Constitution of the United States of America with Explanatory Notes, 19−43. http://www.america.gov/media/pdf/books/constitution.pdf. 03.11.2010.

Устав СФРЈ63: Устав Социјалистичке Федеративне Републике Југославије, Службени лист Социјалистичке Федеративне Републике Југославије, XIX/14.

Устав СФРЈ74: Устав Социјалистичке Федеративне Републике Југославије, Службени лист Социјалистичке Федеративне Републике Југославије, XXX/9.

Published

12-31-2013

How to Cite

Janićijević М. (2013). IMPLICIT VALUES IN THE PREAMBLES OF THE CONSTITUTIONS IN SERBIAN AND ENGLISH: A CRITICAL PRAGMATIC APPROACH. Nasleđe, 10(26), 19–29. Retrieved from http://35.189.211.7/index.php/nasledje/article/view/565