THE BYZANTINE RENAISSANCE AS A FUNDAMENTAL BASIS OF THE ITALIAN RENAISSANCE – MANOJLO HRISOLORAS IN FIRENCE

Authors

  • Предраг Милошевић Academy for Architecture of Serbia; Union University in Belgrade, Faculty of Menadgment in Construction

Keywords:

ренесанса, Византија, Италија, наука, уметност, архитектура, урбанизам

Abstract

The impetus of Byzantine scientists upon the development of humanist learning (studia humanitatis): metaphysics, patristics and science, and upon Italian renaissance in particular were at its ultimate strength in-between 1361 and cca 1531. These hundred and seventy years of direct influence of Byzantine scientists refugees upon the development of Italian humanism and thoughtfulness in the country of European West, especially the power of their role and the grade of their contribution, have rarely been systematically analyzed in all complexity of the issue. That is unfortunately not surprising at all, considering the attitude of European mostly Roman Catholic but protestant West too toward European Orthodox East established long ago. In the famous book of G. Voigt in German language “Classical Antiquity Revival”, that was published in 1859, a year before J. Burckhardt book “Renaissance Civilization in Italy”, both authors emphasized the importance of Greek learning revival as a key to the classical antiquity revival that happen in Italian renaissance. Earlier, in the 17th and 18th Century, in the European West the understanding of Byzantine scholars as most powerful strength to move on talian renaissance, after they were forced to leave Constantinople and the Empire before the Turks in 1453. Leaving a side the facts, now obvious, that Greek refugees, scholars of the great importance like Manuel Chrisoloras and others, appeared with their works and in person in Italy and the West even before that time, and the fact that the most important intellectual battle of Italian and Byzantine scholars in the Middle Ages already happen in 1438-39 in Florence, at the Council of both Christian Churches, there is a hypothesis we now can fully confirm that the presence of Byzantine scholar’s works and themselves as professors at Italian universities as well was actually the fact of primary importance for the earliest Italian humanists to revive Greek learning and turn their full attention to its achievements. Internal developments within Italian city-states were of secondary importance of course. In other words, growing self respect of Italian middle class of the time, within a sophisticated urban environment, was the one that influenced certain citizens that were to become humanist to turn their full attention toward Greek learning, which was the most useful confirmation of their respective way of civil life all together, within Italian citystates. Writings of Greco-Roman Classics, written in Greek and Latin languages, became perfect models for the Italian humanists to support their own urban society and culture.

Author Biography

Предраг Милошевић, Academy for Architecture of Serbia; Union University in Belgrade, Faculty of Menadgment in Construction

Предраг Милошевић рођен је 1959. Дипломирао је на Архитектонском факултету у Сарајеву 1984, магистрирао на Архитектонском факултету у Загребу 1991, а докторирао на Архитектонском факултету у Београду 1995. Радио је као архитекта и урбаниста, као пројектант, теоретичар, историчар и критичар, а сада је редовни професор на Архитектонском одсеку Факултета за градитељски менаџмент Универзитета Унион у Београду, Србија. Предавао је на већем броју универзитета у земљи и иностранству. Изабрани је члан Академије архитектуре Србије, а члан је и Друштва архитеката Београда и Друштва урбаниста Београда. Аутор је великог броја радова у многим пољима архитектуре и урбанизма, од византијске до савремене архитектуре и урбанизма.

References

Allatios, Leo, The Newer Temples of the Greeks, превод на енглески са коментаром: Anthony Cutler, University Park, Rome-London, 1969.
Bandmann, Guenther, Mittelalterliche Architektur als Bedeutungstraeger, Берлин, 1951 (неколико издања).
_, Ikonologie der Architektur, Jahrbuch fuer Aesthetik und allgemeine Kunstwissenschaft, 1951, 67-109 (поново штампано у виду свеска, Darmstadt, 1969).
Barasch, Moshe, Theories of Art From Plato to Winckelmann, New York- London, 1985.
Beck, H. G., Kirche und theologische Literatur im byzantinischen Reich, Munich, 1977.
Bekker, I., izd., Corpus scriptorum historiae byzantinae, Bonn, 1838.
Borinski, Karl, Die Antike in Poetik und Kunsttheorie, 2. свеска, Leipzig 1914-24 (Darmstadt 1965).
Borissavlievitch, Miloutine, Les theories de l’architecture, Paris, 1926.
Chandler, Richard, Travels in Asia Minor or an account of a tour made at the edžpense of the society of Dilettanti, Dublin, 1775 (izd. Edith Clay, London 1971).
Choisy, Auguste, Histoire de l’architecture, 2. sveska, Paris, 1899, неколико издања; факсимилско изд. из 1899, поново штампано Geneva-Paris 1982.
Deno John, Geanakoplos, Constantinople and the West. Essays on the Late Byzantine (Paleologan) and Italian Renaissances and the Byzantine and Roman Churches, Madison, Wsc., 1989.
-, Byzantium: Church, Society and Civilization Seen Through Contemporary Eyes. Chicago, 1984.
Ehrhard, A., Ueberlieferung und Bestand der hagiographischen und homiletischen Literatur der griechischen Kirche, 3. sveska, Tedžte und Untersuchungen zur Geschichte der altchristlichen Literatur, Leipzig, 1937-1952.
Fischer von Erlach, Johann Bernhard, Entwurf einer historischen Architektur, Wien 1721 (јако скраћено издање поново штампано са поговором: Harald Keller, Dortmund, 1978); друго издање: Leipzig, 1725 (факсимил поново штампан 1964); треће издање: Leipzig, 1742.
Friedlaender, Paul, Johannes von Gaza, Paulus Silentiarius. Kunstbeschreibungen justinianischer Zeit, Berlin-Leipzig 1912 (факсимил поново штампан: Hildesheim-New York, 1969).
Gaus, Joachim, Weltbaumeister und Architekt, u: Guenther Binding (изд.), Beitraege ueber Baufuehrung und Baufinanzierung im Mittelalter, Koeln, 1974, 38-67.
Germann, Georg, Einfuehrung in die Geschichte der Architekturtheorie, Darmstadt, 1980 (1993).
Grabar, A., L’empereur dans l’art byzantin, Strasbourg, 1936 (London, 1971).
Hunger, H., Die hochsprachliche profane Literatur der Byzantiner I, Muenchen, 1978.
Huebsch, Heinrich, In welchem Style sollen wir bauen?, Karlsruhe, 1828 (факсимил поново штампан са поговором: Wulf Schirmer, Karlsruhe, 1984).
Jenkins, R. J. H., The Hellenistic Origins of Byzantine Literature, Dumbarton Oaks Papers, 17, Dumbarton Oaks, 1963.
Junecke, Hans, Die wohlbemessene Ordnung. Pythagoreische Proportionen in der historischen Architektur, Berlin, 1982.
Кораћ Војислав, Марица Шупут, Архитектура византијског света, Београд, 1999.
Kustas G. L. , Studies in Byzantine Rhetoric, Salonika, 1973.
Le Corbusier (Charles-Edouard Jeanneret), Le voyage d’Orient (1911), Paris 1965 (италијанско издање: Il Viaggio d’Oriente, Faenza, 1974).
Maguire, Henry, Art and Eloquence in Byzantium, Princeton, NY, 1981.
-, Truth and Convention in Byzantine Descriptions of Works of Art, Dumbarton Oaks Papers, 28, Dumbarton Oaks, 1974.
Mango, Cyril, The Art of the Byzantine Empire 312-1453. Sources and Documents, Toronto-Buffalo-London, 1986 (поново штампано 1993, 1997).
Meridier, L., L’influence de la seconde sophistique sur l’oeuvre de Gregoire de Nysse, Paris, 1906.
Mumford, Lewis, The City in History. Its Origins, its Transformations, and its Prospects (1961), Harmondsworth, 1975.
Onians, John, Bearers of Meaning: The Classical Orders in Antiquity, the Middle Ages, and the Renaissance, Princeton, NY, 1989.
Panofsky, Erwin, Die Entwicklung der Proportionslehre als Abbild der Stilentwicklung, Monatshefte fuer Kunstwissenschaft XIV, 1921, 188-219 (поново штампано у: Panofsky, Aufsaetze zu Grundfragen der Kunstwissenschaft, Berlin, 1964, 1669-204).
-, Idea, Ein Beitrag zur Begriffsgeschichte der aelteren Kunsttheorie (1924), Berlin 1960.
Pevsner, Nikolaus, Studies in Art, Architecture and Design, 2. свеска, London, 1968.
Pochat, Goetz, Geschichte der Aesthetik und Kunsttheorie. Von der Antike bis zum 19. Jahrhundert, Koeln, 1986.
Procopius, Prokop, Opera, III, 2. изд. J. Haury, Leipzig 1913;
Procopius, изд.H. B. Dewing, Glanville Downey, svezak VII (Loeb Classical Library), London-Cambridge, Mass., 1940.
Richter, Jean Paul, Quellen zur byzantinischen Kunstgeschichte, Wien, 1897.
Rosenau, Helen, Vision of the Temple. The Image of the Temple of Jerusalem in Judaism and Christianity, London, 1979.
Saufer, Josef, Symbolik des Kirchengebaeudes und seiner Ausstatung in der Auffassung des Mittelalters, Freiburg, 1924.
Scholfield, Peter Hugh, The Theory of Proportion in Architecture, Cambridge, 1958.
Silentiarius, Paulus, Eĸφςασις του ναου της Αγιας Σοφιας(ekfrazis) u: Paul Friedlaender, Johannes von Gaza, Paulus Silentiarius. Kunstbeschreibungen justinianischer Zeit, Berlin-Leipzig, 1912 (faksimil ponovo štampan: Hildesheim-New York 1969).
Spon, Jacob, Wheeler, George, Voyage d’Italie, de Dalmatie, de Grece, et du Levant, fait aux annees 1675-1676, 2. свеска, Amsterdam 1679 (остала издања: Lyon, 1678, London, 1682).
Tafuri, Manfredo, Teorie e le storia dell’architettura (1968), Roma-Bari, 1976.
Unger, Friedrich Wilhelm, Quellen zur byzantinischen Kunstgeschichte, Wien, 1878.
Viqamaa, T., Studies in Greek Encomiastic Poetry of the Early Byzantine Period, Helsinki, 1968.
Weitzmann, K., The Survival of Mythological Representations in Early Christian and Byzantine Art and Their Impact on Christian Iconography, Dumbarton Oaks Papers, 14, Dumbarton Oaks, 1960.
Zucker, Paul, Town and Square. From the Agora to the Village Green (1959),Cambridge, Mass.-London, 1970.

Published

10-21-2009

How to Cite

Милошевић, П. (2009). THE BYZANTINE RENAISSANCE AS A FUNDAMENTAL BASIS OF THE ITALIAN RENAISSANCE – MANOJLO HRISOLORAS IN FIRENCE. Nasleđe, 6(13), 9–34. Retrieved from http://35.189.211.7/index.php/nasledje/article/view/187