О OUGHT-TO-DO ПРИРОДИ ДЕОНТИЧКЕ МОДАЛНОСТИ
Сажетак
Полазећи од филозофске дистинкције између модалности типа ought-to-do и oughttobe, испитујемо могућност да све деонтички интерпретиране реченице са модалним глаголима имају семантичку репрезентацију модалности типа ought-to-do, без обзира на то да ли се синтаксички реализују као први или други тип. Семантичко-концептуална структура коју предлажемо узима у обзир практичан карактер деонтичког расуђивања, који подразумева постојање свести о агенсима, радњама и актуалном понашању. Овакав карактер деонтичког расуђивања подржава анализа комплемената деонтичких модала (њихов синтаксички, семантичко-онтолошки и темпорални статус), агентивна функција вокатива, могућност проширења садржаја исказа адјунктним клаузама са анафорама или РRО-субјектима, као и специфичан однос између деонтичких реченица и императива.
Референце
Барбирс 1995: S. Barbiers, The Syntax of Interpretation. PhD Dissertation. University of Leiden.
Бат 1997: R. Bhatt, Obligation and Possession. In Heidi Harley (ed.) Papers from the UPenn/MIT Roundtable on Argument Structure and Aspect: Volume 32
of MIT Working Papers in Linguistics. Cambridge, MA: MITWL 32, 21-40.
Bhatt, Rajesh and Roumyana Izvorski. 1997. Genericity, Implicit Arguments, and Control. Proceedings of SCIL 7. Cambridge, MA: MITWL. available at <http://ling.upenn.edu/studentpapers/bhatt/PROarb.ps>
Bhatt, Rajesh and Roumyana Pancheva. 2006. Implicit Arguments. The Blackwell Companion to Syntax, Volume II. London: Blackwell, 554-584.
Бренан 1993: V. Brennan, Root and Epistemic Modal Auxiliaries in English. PhD Dissertation. Amherst: University of Massachusetts.
Батлер 2003: J. Butler, A Minimalist Treatment of Modality. Lingua 113/10, 967-996.
Кастањеда 1970: H-N. Castañeda, On the Semantics of the Ought-to-Do. Synthèse 21/3-4, pp. 449–468.
Кастањеда 1990: H-N. Castañeda, Practical Thinking, Reasons for Doing,
and Intentional Action: The Thinking of Doing, and the Doing of Thinking. Philosophical Perspective 4: Action Theory and The Philosophy of Mind, 273- 308.
Чисом 1970: R. M. Chisholm, The Structure of Intention. The Journal of Philosophy 67/19, 633-647.
Чомски 1982: N. Chomsky, Some Concepts and Consequences of the Theory of Government and Binding, Cambridge: MA.: MIT Press.
Куликавер, Џакендоф 2001: P. Culicover, R. Jackendoff , Control is Not Movement, Linguistic Inquiry 32/3, 493-512.
Дејвидсон 1967: D. Davidson, The Logical Form of Action Sentences, in: Nicholas Rescher (ed.) The Logic of Decision and Action. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press, 188-221. Reprinted in Davidson, Donald. 2001, Essays on Actions and Events, Oxford: Clarendon Press, 2nd edition.
Хеквард 2006: V. Hacquard, Aspects of Modality, PhD Dissertation, MIT.
Хан 1999: C. Han, The Structure and Interpretation of Imperatives: Mood and Force in Universal Grammar, PhD Dissertation, University of Pennsylvania.
Џејкендоф 1972: R. Jackendoff , Semantic Interpretation in Generative Grammar, Cambridge: MA: MIT Press.
Џејкендоф 1999: R. Jackendoff , The Natural Logic of Rights and Obligations, in: Ray Jackendoff , Paul Bloom and Karen Wynn (eds.) Language, Logic, and Concepts, Cambridge: MA: MIT Press, 67-95.
Џејкендоф, Куликавер 2003: R. Jackendoff , P. Culicover, The Semantic Basis of Control in English, Language 79/3, 517-556.
Крацер 1981: A. Kratzer, The Notional Category of Modality, in: Hans-Jürgen Eikmeyer and Hannes Reiser (eds.) Words, Worlds, and Contexts: New Approaches in Word Semantics, New York/Berlin: Walter de Gruyter, 38-74.
Крацер 1991: A. Kratzer, Modality, in: Arnim von Stechow and Dieter Wunderlich (eds.) Semantics: An International Handbook of Contemporary Research, New York/Berlin: Walter de Gruyter, 639-650.
Лајонс 1977: J. Lyons, Semantics, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Милетић 2006: S. Miletić, Modalni agens u deontičkim modalnim iskazima, in: Biljana Čubrović i Mirjana Daničić, (pr.) Beograd: Philologia, 107-117.
Нинан 2005: D. Ninan, Two Puzzles about Deontic Necessity, in: Jon Gajewski, Valentine Hacquard, Bernard Nickel and Seth Yalcin (eds.) New Work on
Modality: Volume 51 of MIT Working Papers in Linguistics, Cambridge, MA: MITWPL, 149-178.
Нуњез, Харис 1998: M. Núñez, P. L. Harris, Psychological and Deontic Concepts: Separate Domains or Intimate Connections? Mind and Language 13/2, 153-170.
Палмер 1990: F. Palmer, Modality and the English Modals, 2nd edition, London: Longman.
Парсонс 1990: T. Parsons, Events in the Semantics of English: A Study in Subatomic Semantics, Cambridge, MA.: MIT Press.
Портнер 2007: P. Portner, Imperatives and Modals. Natural Language Semantics 15, 351-383.
Портнер 2009: P. Portner, Modality. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Риканати 2004: F. Recanati, 'That'-clauses as Existential Quantifi ers, Analysis 64/3, 229-235.
Серл 1969: J. R. Searle, Speech Acts: An Essay in the Philosophy of Language, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Серл 1979: J. R. Searle, Expression and Meaning: Studies in the Theory of Speech Acts, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Серл 1983: J. R. Searle, Intentionality: An Essay in the Philosophy of Mind, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Серл 2001: J. R. Searle, Rationality in Action, Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
Серл 2005: J. R. Searle,. Desire, Deliberation, and Action, in: Daniel Vanderveken (ed.) Logic, Thought and Action, Dordrecht: Springer, 49-78.
Томасон, Сталнакер 1973: R. H. Thomason, and S. C. Robert, A Semantic Theory of Adverbs, Linguistic Inquiry 4, 195-220.
Вилијамс 1985: E. Williams, PRO and the Subject of NP, Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 3/3, 297–315.
Вурмбранд 1999: S. Wurmbrand, Modal Verbs Must Be Raising Verbs, in: Sonya Bird, Andrew Carnie, Jason D. Haugen and Peter Norquest, (eds.).
Proceedings of the 18th West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics. Somerville, MA.: Cascadilla Press, 599-612.
Бат 1997: R. Bhatt, Obligation and Possession. In Heidi Harley (ed.) Papers from the UPenn/MIT Roundtable on Argument Structure and Aspect: Volume 32
of MIT Working Papers in Linguistics. Cambridge, MA: MITWL 32, 21-40.
Bhatt, Rajesh and Roumyana Izvorski. 1997. Genericity, Implicit Arguments, and Control. Proceedings of SCIL 7. Cambridge, MA: MITWL. available at <http://ling.upenn.edu/studentpapers/bhatt/PROarb.ps>
Bhatt, Rajesh and Roumyana Pancheva. 2006. Implicit Arguments. The Blackwell Companion to Syntax, Volume II. London: Blackwell, 554-584.
Бренан 1993: V. Brennan, Root and Epistemic Modal Auxiliaries in English. PhD Dissertation. Amherst: University of Massachusetts.
Батлер 2003: J. Butler, A Minimalist Treatment of Modality. Lingua 113/10, 967-996.
Кастањеда 1970: H-N. Castañeda, On the Semantics of the Ought-to-Do. Synthèse 21/3-4, pp. 449–468.
Кастањеда 1990: H-N. Castañeda, Practical Thinking, Reasons for Doing,
and Intentional Action: The Thinking of Doing, and the Doing of Thinking. Philosophical Perspective 4: Action Theory and The Philosophy of Mind, 273- 308.
Чисом 1970: R. M. Chisholm, The Structure of Intention. The Journal of Philosophy 67/19, 633-647.
Чомски 1982: N. Chomsky, Some Concepts and Consequences of the Theory of Government and Binding, Cambridge: MA.: MIT Press.
Куликавер, Џакендоф 2001: P. Culicover, R. Jackendoff , Control is Not Movement, Linguistic Inquiry 32/3, 493-512.
Дејвидсон 1967: D. Davidson, The Logical Form of Action Sentences, in: Nicholas Rescher (ed.) The Logic of Decision and Action. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press, 188-221. Reprinted in Davidson, Donald. 2001, Essays on Actions and Events, Oxford: Clarendon Press, 2nd edition.
Хеквард 2006: V. Hacquard, Aspects of Modality, PhD Dissertation, MIT.
Хан 1999: C. Han, The Structure and Interpretation of Imperatives: Mood and Force in Universal Grammar, PhD Dissertation, University of Pennsylvania.
Џејкендоф 1972: R. Jackendoff , Semantic Interpretation in Generative Grammar, Cambridge: MA: MIT Press.
Џејкендоф 1999: R. Jackendoff , The Natural Logic of Rights and Obligations, in: Ray Jackendoff , Paul Bloom and Karen Wynn (eds.) Language, Logic, and Concepts, Cambridge: MA: MIT Press, 67-95.
Џејкендоф, Куликавер 2003: R. Jackendoff , P. Culicover, The Semantic Basis of Control in English, Language 79/3, 517-556.
Крацер 1981: A. Kratzer, The Notional Category of Modality, in: Hans-Jürgen Eikmeyer and Hannes Reiser (eds.) Words, Worlds, and Contexts: New Approaches in Word Semantics, New York/Berlin: Walter de Gruyter, 38-74.
Крацер 1991: A. Kratzer, Modality, in: Arnim von Stechow and Dieter Wunderlich (eds.) Semantics: An International Handbook of Contemporary Research, New York/Berlin: Walter de Gruyter, 639-650.
Лајонс 1977: J. Lyons, Semantics, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Милетић 2006: S. Miletić, Modalni agens u deontičkim modalnim iskazima, in: Biljana Čubrović i Mirjana Daničić, (pr.) Beograd: Philologia, 107-117.
Нинан 2005: D. Ninan, Two Puzzles about Deontic Necessity, in: Jon Gajewski, Valentine Hacquard, Bernard Nickel and Seth Yalcin (eds.) New Work on
Modality: Volume 51 of MIT Working Papers in Linguistics, Cambridge, MA: MITWPL, 149-178.
Нуњез, Харис 1998: M. Núñez, P. L. Harris, Psychological and Deontic Concepts: Separate Domains or Intimate Connections? Mind and Language 13/2, 153-170.
Палмер 1990: F. Palmer, Modality and the English Modals, 2nd edition, London: Longman.
Парсонс 1990: T. Parsons, Events in the Semantics of English: A Study in Subatomic Semantics, Cambridge, MA.: MIT Press.
Портнер 2007: P. Portner, Imperatives and Modals. Natural Language Semantics 15, 351-383.
Портнер 2009: P. Portner, Modality. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Риканати 2004: F. Recanati, 'That'-clauses as Existential Quantifi ers, Analysis 64/3, 229-235.
Серл 1969: J. R. Searle, Speech Acts: An Essay in the Philosophy of Language, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Серл 1979: J. R. Searle, Expression and Meaning: Studies in the Theory of Speech Acts, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Серл 1983: J. R. Searle, Intentionality: An Essay in the Philosophy of Mind, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Серл 2001: J. R. Searle, Rationality in Action, Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
Серл 2005: J. R. Searle,. Desire, Deliberation, and Action, in: Daniel Vanderveken (ed.) Logic, Thought and Action, Dordrecht: Springer, 49-78.
Томасон, Сталнакер 1973: R. H. Thomason, and S. C. Robert, A Semantic Theory of Adverbs, Linguistic Inquiry 4, 195-220.
Вилијамс 1985: E. Williams, PRO and the Subject of NP, Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 3/3, 297–315.
Вурмбранд 1999: S. Wurmbrand, Modal Verbs Must Be Raising Verbs, in: Sonya Bird, Andrew Carnie, Jason D. Haugen and Peter Norquest, (eds.).
Proceedings of the 18th West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics. Somerville, MA.: Cascadilla Press, 599-612.
Downloads
Објављено
26.06.2010
Како цитирати
Милетић, С. Д. (2010). О OUGHT-TO-DO ПРИРОДИ ДЕОНТИЧКЕ МОДАЛНОСТИ. Наслеђе, 7(15/2), 133–153. преузето од http://35.189.211.7/index.php/nasledje/article/view/285
Bрој часописа
Секција
Научни радови
